独家：李强披露张又侠案｜中共各级党政机构为何不表态？｜ Li Qiang Discloses the Zhang Youxia Case

Video Description

成为此频道的会员即可获享以下福利： https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQIf3cYIgBVCL3sqDl5j50g/join 独家：李强披露张又侠案｜中共各级党政机构为何不表态？ Exclusive: Li Qiang Discloses the Zhang Youxia Case | Why Are CCP Party and Government Organs at All Levels Staying Silent? 今天是2026年2月5日星期四，在这个各种虚假消息满天飞的档口，老杜希望能够传递一些真实的信息给世界。如果您想了解目前张又侠案的真实信息和最新进展，本期节目会给您很多想要的答案。老杜今天这期节目，是基于一个可靠的情报和一系列可以验证的事实制作的。全部内容只有10多分钟，每一句话都非常重要，建议大家听完。 我们看到，海内外媒体在张又侠落马之后，高度关注中国各级党政机关一反常态，不表态的问题。普遍认为是出反常必有妖，认为，中共内部陷入动荡，各级党委政府，全党上下是不愿意表态，习近平的权力不稳。更有一些朋友乐观地认为，习近平已经掉动不了军队，已经指挥不了各级党政机构了。事实上我们也看到，张又侠刘振利被宣布调查后，从国务院到乡政府，各级党委政府确实均不表态。有关张又侠的通报文件也没有发到地方。连省级单位都没有发到。媒体上，除了军媒，所有党政系统都几乎没有任何，在张又侠案问题上，拥护党中央、拥护习主席的捧臭脚式的所谓歌功颂德评论。就连昨天闭幕的人大常委会，也没有决议取消张又侠、刘振利的全国人大代表资格。其实，根据老杜获得的可靠信息，并不是真的“没反应”，而是习近平在军中震荡之后，主动立了新规矩——把党政系统从军队反腐与清洗的话语场里赶出去，先稳军心，再择机统一口径。换句话说：沉默不是偶然，是命令；不是疏忽，是纪律。老杜通过分析认为，习近平之所以如此做，是因为不想让外界关注他过于集权。在成功干掉军中二把手后，故意制造党政系统不那么支持习近平的假象。从而掩盖本质的绝对集权、独裁统治问题。至于全国人大常委会没有免去张又侠刘振力的全国人大代表资格，理由是调查尚未结束，尚无结论。老杜说这些不是说习近平政权稳，这不是稳，相反，这是真正不稳定，高度不稳定的直接体现。今天我们就来详细讨论这个问题。 Today is Thursday, February 5, 2026. At a time when all kinds of false information are rampant, Lao Du hopes to deliver some truthful messages to the world. If you want to understand the real information and the latest developments in the case of Zhang Youxia, this episode will give you many of the answers you’re looking for. Today’s program by Lao Du is based on reliable intelligence and a series of verifiable facts. The entire content is just over ten minutes long, and every sentence is very important—everyone is encouraged to listen to the end. We have seen that, after Zhang Youxia’s downfall, media both domestic and overseas have paid close attention to the unusual silence of various levels of Chinese Party and government organs. It is widely believed that “abnormality reveals a monster,” and that internal turbulence has gripped the CCP. Across Party committees and government bodies, top to bottom, no one is willing to speak out, suggesting that Xi Jinping’s power is unstable. Some are even optimistic, believing that Xi can no longer command the military or direct the various levels of the Party-state apparatus. In fact, after the investigation of Zhang Youxia and Liu Zhenli was announced, from the State Council down to township governments, no levels of Party or government institutions issued statements. The official notice concerning Zhang Youxia was also not distributed to local levels—not even to provincial units. In the media, aside from military outlets, nearly no Party or government systems offered the typical sycophantic commentary expressing loyalty to the Central Committee and Chairman Xi in the wake of the Zhang Youxia case. Even the National People’s Congress Standing Committee, which just concluded yesterday, did not pass a resolution to revoke the NPC delegate qualifications of Zhang Youxia or Liu Zhenli. In truth, according to reliable information obtained by Lao Du, the silence does not mean “no response,” but rather that Xi Jinping, following the shockwaves in the military, proactively established a new rule: to drive the Party and government systems out of the discourse surrounding military anti-corruption and purges—first to stabilize military morale, then to unify the narrative at an opportune time. In other words: the silence is not accidental, it is an order; it is not neglect, it is discipline. Through analysis, Lao Du believes that Xi Jinping has done this because he does not want outsiders to focus on his over-centralization of power. After successfully eliminating the second-in-command in the military, he deliberately created the illusion that the Party and government systems are not strongly supporting him—thus concealing the essential reality of absolute centralization and dictatorial rule. As for why the National People’s Congress Standing Committee has not removed Zhang Youxia and Liu Zhenli’s delegate status, the reason is that the investigation has not yet concluded, and no final judgment has been reached. Lao Du clarifies that he is not saying Xi Jinping’s regime is stable. This is not stability—on the contrary, it is a direct sign of true instability, of high-level instability. Today we will discuss this issue in detail.