Rating The BEST & WORST Infantry Mobility Vehicles in Ukraine

Video Description

When people talk about the war in Ukraine, they usually focus on tanks, artillery, drones, and missiles. But none of those things matter if soldiers can’t move. In this episode, we take a deep look at the armoured mobility vehicles and MRAPs that keep Ukraine’s war effort running every day, and how they’ve actually performed under fire. Using visually confirmed loss data, battlefield footage, and real-world deployment patterns, we break down how Western, Ukrainian, and Russian mobility vehicles compare when exposed to mines, FPV drones, and artillery. From MaxxPro, Kirpi, Bushmaster, and Senator MRAPs, to Humvees, Kozak, Novator, Iveco LMV, and dozens of other IMVs, this video looks past headlines and into what really matters: volume, survivability, doctrine, and how hard these vehicles are used. We also compare destruction rates, discuss why some vehicles rack up massive losses while still being “successful,” and explain why doctrine often matters more than design. This is part of our ongoing series rating vehicles in Ukraine, following previous episodes on tanks, IFVs, APCs, and artillery. #ukraine #military #equipment 00:00 – Introduction 02:05 – Overall MRAP & IMV losses in Ukraine 05:40 – Varta MRAP/IMV 03:33 – Kozak IMV Performance 04:35 - Novator Losses & Performance 05:33 – Typhoon MRAP & Tigr IMV Performance Ukraine 08:06 - MRAP & IMV Difference 09:28 – MaxxPro performance in Ukraine 10:27 - FFG MRAP in Ukraine 11:40 – Kirpi 1 & 2 in Ukraine 12:45 – Roshel Senator MRAP in Ukraine 14:35 – Bushmaster MRAP in Ukraine 15:35 – Wolfhound, Mamba & Mastiff in Ukraine 16:33 – Dingo, Cougar, M-ATV & BATT in Ukraine 17:19 - Rating MRAPs in Ukraine 19:49 – Transition to IMVs 20:04 – Iveco LMV in Ukraine 20:40 – Humvee, Roshel, Huskey & Other IMV in Ukraine